Many thanks to Jon-Michael Durkin for recommending the Business Week article entitled, "Ten Reasons Gen Xers Are Unhappy At Work: Corporations really need folks in their 30s and early 40s, but there is a tentative relationship at best between that cohort and Corporate America."
www.businessweek.com/managing/content/may2008/ca20080515_250308.htm
While we, as JASC delegates and executive committee members, are for the most part of the Millenial Generation it is also important to consider the previous generation. Generation X. Originally referred to as the "baby bust" generation because of the smaller number of births after the Post-WWII baby boom. Birth years of this generation range from 1965 to 1982, and according to the book by William Strauss and Neil Howe entitled Generations (1991), main influences which affected the development of this generation are the following:
- Disaffectation with governance, a lack of trust in leadership, particularly institutional leadership
- Rampant political apathy
- Increase in divorce
- Increase in mothers in the workplace
- The zero population growth movement
- Availability of birth control pills
- Increase in educational variance
- Decrease in educational funding and loan availability
- Changed career options require more academic requirements and intellectual skill
- Concerns on environmental destruction and ecological issues
- Inception of the internet
- End of the Cold War
(Note: Guilty as charged, I used wikipedia)
But what catches my eye most from this list is the "rampant political apathy" which isn't quite difficult to understand. If you consider the lack of success which was (grudgingly) inherent in the student revolutions of the late 1960s and early 1970s, wouldn't it be quite natural for that disillusion to sink into the generation born during that time? You might even consider it to be something of a quiet, collective trauma. For my part, I think one of the most encouraging characteristics of Generation Y (state side) is their curious optimism and the belief that change is possible. But at the same time it appears that this generation shrinks away from the previous methods of activism and is more willing to collaborate with institutional leadership in order to bring about positive change.
I wonder how things developed in Japan, whose institutional presence is much stronger by comparison...
Of course, I'm generalizing again and I will have to admit right now that one of the main points of caution is this very thing. Nevertheless, it's difficult to talk about generational characteristics without wielding this double edged sword. Standard disclaimer.
Questions to consider: What socio-economic factors are shaping our own (the Millenials) mentality? What political forces and events? What makes us different from the previous generation and why did this change come about? How would this compare with our generational counterparts in Japan?